RAG answer QA
Human review for grounded AI answers.
RAG systems can still cite the wrong passage, miss a caveat, or answer beyond the retrieved evidence. Hire a reviewer to check whether each claim in an answer is actually supported by its sources.
- Suggested budget
- $50–$200 per answer batch
- Deliverable
- Pass, revise, or high-risk per answer with an unsupported-claim list
- Best for
- Support bots, internal knowledge assistants, customer-facing AI search
Example tasks you can request
Keep each task to one bounded input so the reviewer can return clear evidence.
- Check whether each answer claim appears in the retrieved sources.
- Confirm citations point to the specific passage, not the whole document.
- Note missing caveats or uncertainty the sources include.
- Flag answers that combined sources incorrectly.
- Say whether each answer is safe to show a customer or operator.
What the reviewer returns
Ask for evidence, not an opinion. Accept the work when the report has these parts.
- Pass, revise, or high-risk status per answer
- Unsupported claim list with the source that should have been used
- Citation and source mismatch notes
- A corrected answer where useful
- Reviewer confidence, including whether the source set looked incomplete
Suggested payout ranges
Starting points only. Final budgets should match length, source complexity, turnaround, and reviewer experience.
| Scope | Suggested payout |
|---|---|
| Focused batch of 5 to 10 answers with sources | $50–$100 |
| 20 to 40 answers or long, multi-source documents | $100–$200 |
| Larger audits or a recurring sample | $200–$500+ |
How to scope it
Four steps from AI output to an accepted review.
Export the answers with their retrieved context
Each answer needs the passages the system retrieved, not only the final text.
Say who sees the answers
Customer-facing answers get a stricter bar than internal ones.
Ask for a corrected answer
A reviewer who rewrites the unsupported sentence saves a second round.
Approve the quote
The operator confirms scope, reviewer, and price before the review starts.
Scope note. Human review reduces risk and creates a review record, but it does not promise perfect accuracy, legal compliance, or a business outcome, and it does not replace professional legal, medical, financial, or compliance advice. GoHireHumans is a listing and payment connector; the reviewer is an independent worker.
Related pages
Neighbouring pages in the AI QA cluster, each with a different scope.
Check one batch of RAG answers.
Email the answers with their retrieved sources. An operator scopes the review and you approve the quote before anyone starts.