Trust policy
AI QA scope and trust policy.
What a human review of AI-generated work does and does not promise, what each side provides, and the tool-use rule reviewers follow. Human QA reduces risk; it is not legal, medical, financial, or compliance advice.
- Applies to
- Every AI QA task and pilot request
- Reviewer rule
- Evidence and human-written rationale
- Not included
- Professional advice or outcome promises
What reviewers provide
Every AI QA task should return these.
- Specific issue notes tied to a location in the work
- Source links or screenshots where relevant
- Human-written reasoning
- A clear pass, revise, or high-risk recommendation
What buyers provide
A reviewer can only verify against what you supply.
- The AI output
- The original source or context if it exists
- The review type you want
- Deadline and output format
Not a professional substitute. Human QA can catch errors and improve quality, but it does not replace professional legal, medical, financial, compliance, or safety advice, and no review promises a particular outcome.
Tool use by reviewers
Assistance is allowed; substitution is not.
Reviewers may use tools to assist, but the final review must include human judgment, evidence, and original rationale. AI-only copy-paste reviews are not acceptable and can be sent back.
How GoHireHumans fits
A connector, not a party to the review.
GoHireHumans is a listing and payment connector for structured review work. The managed AI QA pilot is manual concierge intake: an operator scopes the request and you approve the quote and review plan before any reviewer starts. Direct-payment instructions are not allowed in listings or applications.
Related pages
Neighbouring pages in the AI QA cluster, each with a different scope.
Before publishing or shipping AI output, get a human QA report with evidence.
Email the output and its sources. An operator scopes the review and you approve the quote before anyone starts.