AI QA scope and trust policy
Human QA can reduce risk, but it should not be misrepresented as a legal, medical, financial, or compliance guarantee.
What reviewers should provide
- Specific issue notes
- Source links or screenshots where relevant
- Human-written reasoning
- Clear pass/revise/high-risk recommendation
What buyers should provide
- The AI output
- Original source/context if available
- Desired review type
- Deadline and output format
Not a professional substitute
Human QA can catch errors and improve quality, but does not replace professional legal, medical, financial, compliance, or safety advice.
AI-use rule for reviewers
Reviewers may use tools to assist, but the final review must include human judgment, evidence, and original rationale. AI-only copy-paste reviews are not acceptable.
Best buyer habit
Before publishing or shipping AI output, get a human QA report with evidence.